Random Thoughts

about reading, writing, and anything else that interests me

Do we need an LMS?

Yesterday I saw Stephen‘s link to a post called A Post-LMS Manifesto on The End in Mind.  I read part of the post and moved on.  Today, however, I felt a need to go back and read the post more closely.  The reason:  I spent all day working on putting a new course up on Blackboard.

My university — heck, the whole state of New Mexico practically — is switching from WebCT to Blackboard.  I need to become familiar with Blackboard.  I even decided to take a course on using Blackboard and Wimba, a “live classroom” that can be integrated in Blackboard.  So for this course, I worked today on setting up a new course.  And I realized that it is a lot of work for very limited benefit.

In his Manifesto, Jon Mott says:

There is, at its very core, a problem with the LMS paradigm. The “M” in “LMS” stands for “management.” This is not insignificant. The word heavily implies that the provider of the LMS, the educational institution, is “managing” student learning. Since the dawn of public education and the praiseworthy societal undertaking “educate the masses,” management has become an integral part of the learning. And this is exactly what we have designed and used LMSs to do—to manage the flow of students through traditional, semester-based courses more efficiently than ever before. The LMS has done exactly what we hired it to do: it has reinforced, facilitated, and perpetuated the traditional classroom model…

I don’t really feel a need to manage my students’ learning as much as facilitate it.  I know that I do way too much managing, anyway, but I am trying to cut back on that.

I want my students to set up a blog and use it throughout their ESL coursework and beyond.  I want them to have access to each others’ work and learn from it.  I want to break away from that traditional classroom model as much as I can in a traditional classroom setting.

Mott continues:

While LMS providers are making laudable efforts to incrementally make their tools more social, open, modular, and interoperable, they remain embedded in the classroom paradigm. The paradigm—not the technology—is the problem.

This semester I have been using our blogs and wikis much more than WebCT.  I have really enjoyed the freedom I find there.  Of course, I have a lot more experience with blogs and wikis than I do with WebCT or Blackboard, but I don’t think that is the only reason I prefer them.  I really honestly and truly love the fact that people not associated with my class can comment on our work.  I even like the fact that someone could actually participate along with us all semester long, even though they weren’t enrolled in the course.

If my online course for this summer “makes”, it will be taught not through Blackboard but through a blog.  In the fall I intend to do the same.  The only real reason I can see to use Blackboard at all will be for storage of large files and possible for students to have access to their grades.  Aside from that, I don’t see much value in it.

Opening up my classes, though, is scary.  In that regard it would be much easier to use Blackboard.  Looking at my class blog, you may see that I haven’t done such a great job of getting my students to improve their writing.  Looking at the wiki you can see that I only got a small portion of what I had planned done.  I have a lot of great ideas and not as much follow-through.  But I think it is important to be honest and open about my practice.  I am not a perfect teacher.  I don’t have all the answers to anything — much less to how to reach all my students and have them learn everything I think they need to learn.  I don’t even know how to get past thinking that I know what they need to learn.  But I know that the openness of blogs and wikis and the transparency they give to my classes bring me closer to solving that last problem than Blackboard does!

So my answer to the question, “Do we need an LMS?” would be “No.”  What do you think?

Advertisements

Single Post Navigation

6 thoughts on “Do we need an LMS?

  1. From my perspective as an LMS administrator, the management in LMS is why universities can include online learning in their ERP portfolio which otherwise is composed of the student information system, human resources, and finances. One site which provides it to all students and the faculty is easier to manage than dozens of confusingly related items.

  2. Thanks for your comment. I am sure an LMS is much easier. But I am not convinced that makes it better!

    Thanks for stopping by and taking time to comment!

  3. The word “need” is too strong. You could ask, Do you need blogs or wikis? And the answer would be “no.” A better question is, Is a blog, wiki, or LMS useful (for a particular purpose)?

  4. John on said:

    I think Charles has focused the question better. I don’t “need” the LMS, but I certainly find it helpful as a place for my students to submit their papers, and for me to post the PowerPoints from classes and web pages for different activities. I find the LMS a misnomer because I don’t think any learning is managed, but it does provide a nice place to post some material for the students to use as they need it. I just wish they designed the LMSs better for teachers and students and they didn’t take so much of my time managing them.

  5. Pingback: LMS part 2 « Random Thoughts

  6. Pingback: LMS or No LMS…That is the Question « « Education Technology & MoreEducation Technology & More

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: